It is true that the cyber space has been regularly marked by major transgressions. In 2004, Chinese hackers began to spy heavily on businesses. In 2010, American and Israeli hackers invented Stuxnet, the first computer weapon of strategic significance. In 2014, North Korean hackers are, for the first time, sabotaging a company, Sony Pictures. In 2016, Russian hackers are the first to sabotage critical infrastructure, plunging Ukraine's inhabitants into the dark. The same year, they are also the first to use the computer tool to influence an election.
Diplomatic action can bring appeasement
Some red lines have not been crossed yet. "Apart from some unimportant exceptions, I have never seen a group of state origin falsify data on a large scale, such as personal data or health data. I have never seen a group impersonate another group either. In theory, it is perfectly possible, but for now everyone is content to erase his tracks to deny his involvement. What scares me is that these two rules are broken one day. We will then know again an escalation of violence "says Kevin Mandia.
However, such a progression is not inevitable. In 2015, Presidents Barack Obama and Xi Jinping, for example, managed to reach an agreement to stop industrial espionage. "This agreement continues to be relevant. While there has recently been an increase in Chinese espionage in the United States, it is certain that it is for an economic reason, "says John Hultquist, Director Intelligence Analysis at FireEye. Proof that diplomatic action can bring down the pressure. "But one thing countries will never give up is political espionage"says Kevin Mandia.
Source link
https://www.01net.com/actualites/cyberguerre-l-escalade-de-la-violence-est-elle-une-fatalite-1784141.html
