As we recall, Segal revealed tapes that Israel Bachar heard, his counselor at the time of Benny Gantz says he was not worthy of leadership, and later Dayan revealed the source of Segal.
On Thursday, a faculty colleague came up with an interview with Ilana Dayan in the IDF waves, claiming that the unusual step Dayan had taken was part of the Israeli media’s move to protect Benny Gantz.
“I think if there was a Netanyahu consultant who would say that because of the investigations he was not acting for the benefit of the state, they would deal with it for a week and not deal with who obtained the recording. How do I know? Because 48 hours later she sat in the Ilana Dayan studio and showed recordings of Nathan Eshel. “I did not check that the recording was brought by a Gantz consultant, but there was no question as to who brought the recording. Instead of dealing with the story itself, it deals with the morality of the recording,” Segal argued.
Dayan, for her part, claimed, “In my opinion, I did not reveal a source and I have no idea what your source is. The thing is that Netanyahu talks to the rabbi the day before the tape is released. The fact that the prime minister sensed the tape is not something you as a citizen want to know?”
She went on to ask, “If a tape revealed that someone close to Bibi says Bibi is dangerous, do you think I would not publish if it came from a Gantz consultant?”
• Like the Shabbat Square Facebook page and stay up-to-date
Segal replied: “I think it would come after long days of discussing the story itself, and then as Side Kick they would discuss your exposure. Was an attempt to downplay the story itself. Did I get surprised by the dimensions? The answer is no. People interpreted the screenings as a political occurrence. Seeing Ilana Dayan in front of a faculty member they see an echo of the political debate. It’s not good for me and you but it’s good for Netanyahu and Gantz. “
Ilana Dayan allegedly tried to claim that a colleague was hurt by the source’s exposure, which contributes to those who claim to be “Prime Minister Netanyahu’s mouthpiece”. Staff replied: “Anyone who says this does not only want to hurt me, but to avoid the serious situation that other opinions are heard.”
“I mention that Netanyahu’s only prospect for government in the past year, with the proposal to my father Gabay and Tal Russo, I thwarted when I published the talks. What is bothering them is not Bibi, that is the ideology. Until I came to the Israeli media there was not one person who thought he would bring a bunch of these killers here Mistake”.
“I read a column in Haaretz on the Internet that explains that I celebrated with the samples too much. Why didn’t the Land newspaper celebrate my mistake a few months ago that I thought Netanyahu was going to crash? Because the country wants to tattoo the only representation of conservative and right-wing positions in the Israeli media,” added Amit Segal.
Source link
https://www.kikar.co.il/350091.html
