"Count, hysterical revolt without explaining three goals taken in 20 '. The Inter company has a duty to intervene"

Mario Sconcerti, from the columns of Corriere della Sera, considers the two cases "very serious in form and substance With you and Naples, "both seen as" continuations of the case Icardi, in the sense that they are rapidly changing the status of a great footballer. No longer an employee, as Law 91 of 1981 says, but now other companies that attribute the same rights as the parent company. When Inter quarreled with Icardi and accepted the mediation of an external figure, a lawyer, he sanctioned the right to an equal dialogue. There began another football, almost completely to be rewritten and outside the sports laws ".

Beyond the reference to the case of the Argentine striker, according to Sconcerti "Conte today forgives all excess because he is a great coach, but to Dortmund he literally held a meeting against his company. Very hard and decomposed. Any of us in any company today would have been heavily filmed if not fired. We are close to the right cause. A hysterical revolt consumed without an explanation of the lost match, an opinion on how Inter could have scored the same goal three times in 20 minutes. Perhaps for Conte the pressure of an open and demanding city like Milan is too much. Perhaps it is too much that Inter does not win and Conte does not hold his own. But we are beyond the nervous breakdown. Here society has no right to intervene, it has a duty. Otherwise it does damage to itself, to the team and to any future management ".