<
div id=””>
<p>Interview with Yosef Hadad (Photo: Avi Chai)
On the joint list
Expressed satisfaction with the decision
The Supreme Court to approve MK Hiba Yazbak
To run for election to the 23rd Knesset,
However, in Arab society there are those who believe that its place is outside the legislature. One of them is Yosef Hadad, an Arab-Israeli who served in the Golani Brigade and was wounded in the Second Lebanon War. “This is one big scam,” Haddad told a Ynet studio on Monday following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the decision of the Central Election Commission on Yizbak’s case.
All the 2020 elections in one place – Ynet’s election complex
The Supreme Court decision yesterday was passed by a five-judge majority against four. Justices Uzi Polgman, Yitzhak Amit, Dafna Barak-Erez, Manny Mazuz and Anat Baron believe that the MK who previously expressed support for terrorists must be allowed, while President Esther Hayes and Judges Noam Solberg, David Mintz and Joseph Elron believe otherwise.
MK will rebuke(Photo: Shalom)
“We know how to read the map.” Hadad(Photo: Elad Barmi)
Public relations activist Haddad, the founder of “Together Arabs,” said, referring to the widespread issue, “Unfortunately, the Supreme Court decision has shown that anyone who supports terrorism or posts a terrorist support post may be a Knesset member.”
– The problem is the message to the Arab-Israeli public?
“True. The Arab sector is a smart sector. We know how to read the map, the territory. The Arab sector on the street knows Yizbak’s remarks. It comes from the Balad party, which is the extreme part of the joint list. The seal was given to the other contestants, including the Arab public, to speak out against the State of Israel and to support terrorism. To me personally, this is very much a hole. My friends and activists in our association have received this gospel very hard. ”
– You are an exceptional voice in the Arab-Israeli public.
“You can’t be far from what is being said right now. My voice is a voice coming out, I’m not a different voice. There are quite a few voices like my voice, we don’t speak loudly and it comes from the same fear of extremists. I personally rise every day with a certain threat One or the other, it sounds like I’m a unique voice, but behind my voice is a wide, countless message that tells me to keep doing what I’m doing.
“The Jewish sector has an existing outlook because of social networks. We always see the extreme voice. For example, in the demonstration in Baqa al-Gharbiya there were a few hundred with Palestinian flags and thus it represented 1.9 million from the Arab-Israeli sector. This is not fair.”
MK Yizbak refers to Supreme Court decision (Photo: Ido Erez)
Yizbak herself arrived in Haifa this morning to borrow
The leader of the northern faction of the Islamic Movement, Raad Salah,
Sentenced to two years and four months in prison for incitement to terrorism. “We said from the beginning that this decision is expected to have no evidentiary infrastructure against me,” noted MK Yizbak following the Supreme Court decision on her case, “and said from the beginning that it is part of the ongoing delegitimization and incitement and demonetisation process that is being carried out by Arab Knesset members and Arab society.
“We struggle and work for values and promote democracy, justice and equality, so whoever really comes and tries to attribute to us all kinds of accusations that are ‘incitement to violence’ – then the court explicitly said that there is no evidential foundation, that all my activities are both legitimate and according to law and I This also indicates that I will continue in the same way of working for justice, for equality, for democracy and for ending the occupation. ”
On the decision to support Salah, MK Yizbak said: “I came here because Sheikh Salah is also suffering from political persecution. I will continue my activities for the company in the most important areas. ”
The Supreme Court hearing yesterday focused on the disqualification of Article 7A (a) (3) of the Basic Law: The Knesset, which states that a candidate can be prevented from running for Knesset elections if there are actions or statements in his favor of “armed struggle, enemy state or terrorist organization, against state” Israel”. The disqualification applicants, including the Likud parties, Israel Beitano and Jewish power, referred in this context to a number of evidence, most notably the following two evidence:
The first, a post she shared, will be back in 2015 with a photo of terrorist Samir Kuntar, who in 1979 killed Nahariya Dani Haran and his four-year-old daughter Einat. The picture was shared after the death of the terrorist in Syria, and it says “The Mujahid Samir Kuntar martyr” as well as “Not to return from Palestine but to return to Palestine”.
The second, a post she shared, will backfire in 2013 with a picture of terrorist Dalal Mugrabi, who led the terrorist squad that carried out the terrorist attack on the coastal road in 1978, in which 35 Israelis were killed, including 12 children. Yezbek added to the picture of terrorist Mugrabi the words “Dalal Mugrabi lived 20 years and did all this. Blessings of resistance are blessed.”
Attorney General Avihai Mandelblit believed that Yezbak was very close to “the prohibition that precludes him from running in the Knesset elections” because the evidence presented, and in particular the collaborations on Kuntar and Mograbi, is serious and may indicate identification and support for terrorists who committed heinous murders. The advisor stressed that if it had not been for the explanations and explanations detailed in Yezbek’s affidavits and if he had not been raised by the latter due to such explanations to her credit, there would have been evidence presented to establish a critical mass justifying Yezbek’s refusal to address the 23rd Knesset.
The majority judges emphasized that if there is doubt as to the substance of the evidence it must act in favor of the list or candidate, in view of the high position of the right to choose and be elected and given the stringent standards established over the years by the Supreme Court ruling that preventing a candidate from participating in the legislature from being excluded for exceptional cases.
It was further stated that Yizbak’s statements should be given significant weight, as was done in the past by other candidates from all corners of the political spectrum, and that Yizbak has repeatedly stated through various means that it opposes any violence “of any kind against anyone, whether in uniform or in uniform.”
The minority opinion, which also included President Esther Hayim, stated, however, that the evidence detailed in Yizbak’s case is inconsequential and does not indicate support for terrorist acts, the harsh and horrific acts carried out against the State of Israel. Accordingly, the minority opinion, it is one of the most extreme and extreme cases in which the evidence presented is sufficient to formulate a “critical mass” of compelling, clear and unambiguous evidence of Yazbak’s support for an armed struggle by a terrorist organization against the State of Israel.
