Turkish offensive in Syria: why was the Sevres treaty that granted a state to the Kurds never been respected?

0
6
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Linkedin
ReddIt
Tumblr
Telegram
Mix
VK
Digg
LINE


International

All info on

Turkish offensive against Kurdish forces in Syria

EXPLANATIONS – Despite a secular history, the Kurds do not have a country to speak of. A treaty dating from 1920, however, allowed them to claim an independent Kurdish state: it is the Treaty of Sevres, which has never been respected. For what reasons ? Response elements.

With more than 25 million people, the Kurds have never benefited from the creation of an independent state. As early as 1695, however, these people of Indo-European origin, predominantly Muslim Sunni, claimed its creation, but it has always been considered a threat to the integrity of the countries that cross the Kurdistan region. Indeed, the Kurds are mostly present in Iraq, Iran, Turkey and finally in Syria. Elsewhere in the world there are Kurdish communities in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Lebanon, and Europe, including Germany.

Over the centuries, Kurds have preserved their culture, languages ​​and traditions within a clan organization that has never found echo in diplomatic discussions. Still, it was virtually acquired, as early as 1920, that the latter would be able to benefit from an independent state, or at least open the way to the establishment of it. Except that nothing went as planned …

Read also

  • Turkish offensive in Syria: the latest news
  • "We are abandoned": the anger of the Kurds of France after the Turkish offensive

A treaty canceled by another

The question of a Kurdish state goes back to an old treaty, signed a hundred years ago before being questioned: following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, at the end of the First World War, the Treaty of Sevres opened the way for the creation of an independent Kurdistan. The Kurds were then part of the Ottoman Empire and saw themselves for the first time granted the opportunity to become a nation similar to others. In fact, however, the treaty, initialed by Sultan Mehmed VI, has never been ratified or applied.

The territory then attributed to the Kurds was located in the eastern parts of Anatolia, shattering the geography of historical Turkey. An insupportable idea for Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, at the time general, who went to war, first against the Armenians, then against the Greeks.

Victorious, he was able to impose a new treaty, that of Lausanne which will replace that of Sevres, whose agreements were broken at the same time. Signed between the government of the Turkish parliament led by the father of modern Turkey and the signatory powers of the Treaty of Sevres at the end of a peace conference organized from November 1922 to July 1923 in Switzerland, the Treaty of Lausanne defined new Turkish borders, allowing the country to recover territories over Greece, while putting an end to the economic and financial privileges of certain foreign states.

A consecration of Turkish domination that also recognizes the existence of Jewish and Christian minorities (Armenians and Greeks), "privilege" that will not get the Kurds.

Read also

  • The Kurds "did not help us" during the Second World War: why Trump is wrong
  • "We are abandoned": the anger of the Kurds of France after the Turkish offensive

The Treaty of Lausanne then consecrated the domination of Turkey, Iran, the United Kingdom (for Iraq) and France (for Syria) on the Kurdish populations.



Source link
https://www.lci.fr/international/offensive-turquie-en-syrie-pourquoi-le-traite-de-sevres-qui-accordait-un-etat-aux-kurdes-n-a-t-il-jamais-ete-respecte-2134916.html

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

five − four =