The Dpcm of 10 April – which consolidated the lockdown – put black on white: “Stay forbidden any move to homes other than that main including second homes used for vacation “. In addition, the decree of 10 April confirmed the prohibition on returning to one’s residence or domicile. The “no” to second homes, in the Dpcm of April 26, there is not. The text excludes any movement between different Regions, except for work needs, reasons of absolute urgency or proven health reasons or in case of return to the own residence / domicile. Within a region, however, only mention is made of targeted displacements to meet “relatives”, but nothing more.
Until clarification by Minister De Micheli, therefore, the doubt remained as to whether or not it was allowed to reach a second home within the same region. A decision that will probably be up to the end individual governors. Me too’Uncem, the Union of Mountain Communities and Municipalities, asks for “clarifications in particular on the use of second homes. We look forward to hearing from you interpretative circulars of the Interior Ministry to give answers “.
Support ilfattoquotidiano.it: never like now
we need you.
In these pandemic weeks we journalists, if we do our job with conscience,
we do a public service. This is also why we are proud every day here at ilfattoquotdiano.it
to offer hundreds of new content for free to all citizens: news, exclusive insights,
expert interviews, surveys, videos and much more. All this work, however, has a great economic cost.
Advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues.
Not in line with the access boom. This is why I ask those who read these lines to support us.
To give us a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week,
fundamental for our work.
Become a supporting user by clicking here.
Thanks
Peter Gomez
Support now
Previous article
Coronavirus, 333 more deaths but the contagion curve is below 1%. Less than 2 thousand in Resuscitation: it hasn’t happened since March 16th
Next article
Coronavirus, Istat: “The first 150 thousand serological tests on a sample of inhabitants of 2 thousand Municipalities, representative of age and activity”
